An interesting read.

Jasper Kirkby, have recently published an article about aerosols that chemtrailplanet.net writes about:

"In an article published in the journal NATURE” Kirkby reports that cosmic rays “seemed to enhance the production of nanometre-sized particles from the gaseous atmosphere by more than a factor of ten.” He added, however, that the particles in question are far too small to serve as cloud condensation nuclei.

Dr. Joyce Penner’s statement in the TV News clip echos the 1999 Climate Change Publication – “IPCC SPECIAL REPORT ON AVIATION AND THE GLOBAL ATMOSPHERE” (PDF), page 17:

“Contrails tend to warm the Earth’s surface, similar to thin high clouds”.

So jet aircraft are dumping chemical aerosols high in the atmosphere to create artificial contrails that spread into thin, high artificial clouds that your TV meteorologist has been told to misrepresent by telling the public they’re only “ice crystals”.

Dr. Kirkby’s comment confirming that jet aircraft are dumping aerosols into the atmosphere reveals that this covert geoengineering and chemtrail operation is well known by government agencies like NASA, NOAA, the FAA, – the IPCC climate scientists being paid to churn out climate change propaganda and geoengineers like David Keith, Ken Caldeira and their boss, Bill Gates.

The public needs to demonstrate their outrage at the massive conspiracy of government secrecy that allows these toxins and bio-weapons to rain down on global populations."

Source

Was MH17 a false flag attack?

First of all, I am not claiming that MH17 was a false flag, nor do I claim I have any proof of it. But that being said, the outcome of the attack may serve people with a hidden agenda. It is not up to me to say that it was a false flag attack or a simply evil men profiting from.

Take a look at this article. As you can read, it discusses several anti missile systems, that is capable of protecting an airplane against missiles such as the one that supposedly shut down MH17. But, it also concludes that the systems are either dangerous or too expensive to realistically be used, the article later settles with concluding that chaff is a better alternative to use. Please note that the article also claims that chaff isn't a good system to protect against the particular missiles that shut down MH17. The article writes: "Such systems, designed to counter smaller, shoulder-fired, heat-seeking missiles, would offer little defence against large sophisticated radar-guided missiles, such as the BUK system reportedly used to shoot down MH17."

Still this is the system that airline companies seems to consider the best alternative.

It does not seem like mentioning chaff is not a coincidence. If there comes up weird things on radars, the go to explanation by so called chemtrails "debunkers" is, almost always, that it was simply chaff. The military were either testing or training with the use of chaff.

Ask yourself the question: How many times will commercial pilots be training with chaff? Will every single weird radar phenomenon be explained as commercial pilots training with chaff, or simply claiming that a container of chaff accidentally discharged?

Another aspect is that commercial airplanes will now get additional containers, supposedly to hold the chaff itself. Most likely most of the ground crew will never get in contact with those, and only some few special personnel will be handling those. Which makes it easier to load up the tanks used with toxic substances, for spraying at high altitude.

Whether MH17 was a false flag attack or the people behind chemtrails are simply trying to profit from the opportunity is not for me to decide, but the end result will be that any weird phenomenon in the sky can easily be credited to chaff, and thereby silencing anyone that tries to question it.

Learn the difference between contrails and chemtrails

I often get people that claims that chemtrails are actually contrails, and it has always been this amount of contrails in the sky. But everyone with a working memory knows that some 20 years ago contrails used to always dissipate and disappear in a matter of minutes. That is no longer the case, as chemtrails usually linger on in the sky, and spreads out and remaining thick instead of dissipating and disappearing.


Anyone in their right mind will notice the difference between the trails in this video. And it doesn't take a genius to realize that they have become more often in recent years, and in fact, didn't exist some 20 years. All you have to do is talk to someone that still has their memory intact. I encourage people to look at that video, so they can learn to recognize chemtrails when they see them. So you can record the sprayings and keep a track of when and where they occur.


I would love the people of earth to speak out against chemtrails, so we can stop letting this destruction of our planet to proceed. But so many people refuse to look critical against the evidence, and rather swallow a comfortable truth, than see a harsh reality. We need to get people all over the world to wake up.


Please read about chemtrails and be critical, then you will understand the truth. And spread the words about chemtrails, so other people will do the same! Don't be afraid to spread the videos so that people will learn to look into the sky, and they can see the evidences themselves.


Thanks in Advance!

Chemtrails Inside and Out

I just wanted to post this video, and let you all think about what kind of images it is you can see.